"With earnings growth on the decline, there's renewed interest in what was once considered an old-fashioned investment."

 
  -from Dividend Paying Stocks May Lead a Trend
 
 
Slide Mountain, NY Copyright Judy Glasel

A Look at Previous Recession-Induced Bear Markets
(And Performance of High-Dividend Equities)

Miller/Howard Investments (2009)

We look at previous recession-induced bear markets and how high yield equities have recovered in relation to the S&P 500.

Also see our recent market overview.

 

The correlation between high yielding equities and attractive long term performance has been exhaustively studied over the past few years. Most studies point to a positive impact of dividends on investment returns. We have included a few of the studies on this page as we hope that they will provide you with some insight into a time-tested approach to investing in the equity markets.
Rolling Excess Return of High-Yield Stocks vs. S&P 500 This chart illustrates the rolling excess return of high-yield stocks
over the S&P 500 over 3, 5, 7, and 10-year periods. HIgh-yield stocks
outperformed the S&P 500 in 71% of the 3-year periods and 84% of the
10-year periods.

Global Dividend Strategy

Credit Suisse (Jan. 2009)

In the majority of markets examined, the maximum performance was delivered by companies with high dividend yields and low payout ratios. Stocks with high yields generally outperformed those with low yields in all markets examined.

Returns of S&P 500 Stocks by Dividend Policy

Ned Davis (Nov 2004)

A look at stock market returns from 1972 based on dividend policy. Dividend growers and initiators gained 10.6% annum vs. a 4.3% gain per annum for non dividend-paying stocks.

Initial Look at Dividend Slices

Graphs of Dividend Slices

John Walter Russell (2007-2008)

Among dividend paying companies (slices B, C and D), the regression lines are nearly parallel. To an excellent approximation, companies with higher dividend payments have higher returns. That is, slice D is consistently better than slice C, which is consistently better than slice B.

Surprise! Higher Dividends = Higher Earnings Growth

Robert Arnott and Clifford S. Asness (December 2001)

Finds that low payout ratios historically precede low earnings growth. Empirical facts conform to a world in which managers possess private information that causes them to pay out a large share of the earnings when they are optimistic and a small share when they are pessimistic. The facts also fit a world in which low payout ratios lead to inefficient empire building, the funding of less-than-ideal projects and investments, leading to poor subsequent growth, while high payout ratios lead to more carefully chosen projects with relatively high returns.

Keeping Faith with Stocks (excerpt from Credit Suisse Global Investment Returns Yearbook 2009)

Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh and Mike Staunton (2009)

Breaks out the historical equity premium into three components: (i) geometric mean dividend yield net of the real risk free rate, (ii) annualized growth rate of real dividends, (iii) the annualized change in the price/dividend ratio over time. Finds that the dividend yield has been the dominant factor historically. $1 invested in US stocks at the start of 1900 and reinvesting all dividend income would have grown in purchasing power by 582 times, vs. 6 times for price only return and 10 times for bonds.

The Case for a High and Growing Dividend Stock Strategy in Retirement Portfolios

Jack Garnder (2008)

An allocation to high-dividend-paying stocks had a significantly positive impact on both the portfolio's withdrawal rate and its sustainability.

The Future for Investors (chart taken from book)

Link to book information

Jeremy Siegel (2005)

Jeremy Siegel ranks the S&P 500 by dividend yield from 1957 to 2002. The highest yielding quintile (top 20% of S&P 500 based on yield) produced an annualized return of 14.27% vs. an annualized return of 11.18% for the S&P 500 Index.

Dividends and the Three Dwarfs

Robert Arnott (2003)

Dividends are the main source of the real return we expect from stocks. Dividends not only dwarf inflation, growth, and changing valuation levels individually, but they also dwarf the combined importance of inflation, growth, and changing valuation levels.

Company Size and Stock Style Do Matter When Determining How Best to Use Corporate Cash

DeMarche Associates (2006)

Looks at corporate uses of free cash flow as a valuation metric. Examines possible uses of cash - dividend increases, stock buy back, mergers and acquisitions, research and developement, capital expenditures. For the period 1990 - 2005, companies that use their free cash flow to increase dividends outperformed companies that utilitized their cash in other ways.

Dividend Yields and Stock Returns: Evidence from a Country without Taxes

Michael Lemmon and Thanh Nguyen (March 2008)

The positive relation between dividend yields and stock returns is often attributed to tax policies. This study documents a robust dividend yield effect in the Hong Kong market where neither dividend income nor capital gains are taxed.

Do Dividends Matter More in Declining Markets?

Kathleen Fuller and Michael Goldstein (Dec. 2005)

The short answer is yes. Dividend-paying stocks outperform non-dividend-paying stocks by 1% to 1.5% per month in declining markets than in advancing markets.

A Robust Estimation of the Relation Between Stock Returns, Size, Dividend Yield and Payout Ratio

I.D. McManus, O. Gwilym and S.H. Thomas (June 2002)

Examines the relationship between Returns and Dividends in the context of the UK Stock Market. Concludes that the Payout Ratio is an important adjunct to Dividend Yield in explaining returns.

Corporate Cash Reserves and Acquisitions

Jarrad Harford (November 1998)

Cash-rich firms are more likely than other firms to attempt acquisitions. Stock return evidence shows that acquisitions by cash-rich firms are value decreasing.

The Effect of Dividend Initiaitons on Stock Returns

Yanli Wang (April 2005)

Consistent with previous studies, the results show that dividend initiations have significantly positive effects on stock returns.